🔗 Share this article

Iran is prepared to resume nuclear talks with Washington on condition that it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared fresh requests had originated from go-betweens to reopen discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to access struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Walking a Difficult Route

Araghchi is treading a difficult path since Iran wishes not to be seen to be acting from a position of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium domestically that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Prior Talks Unexpectedly Ended

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with Donald Trump claiming the sites had been eliminated. Following this, European countries employed their authority to reimpose international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Offered

Iran's diplomats stated they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was settled an local partnership with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Diplomats stated repeatedly they had reached agreement with the US representative the US official only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Status

Iran's diplomats declared the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if talks resume.

The US president in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran sought to resume discussions, but privately Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from America either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts diplomacy is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Position

In his speech to the forum, designed to portray the US as a controlling nation that misuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the dispute could not be resolved by combat operations. He said the assaults started with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were executed with complete American awareness and coordination, making confidence difficult to rebuild.

Negotiations Continues the Final Resolution

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was America and the European states that had consistently attempted to impose their demands during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be active and continues the ultimate answer to resolve disagreements, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"If they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and respect, they will get a answer in the same tone."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was certain Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We acquired multiple understandings from this war; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He added: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to destroy, remains in place. The installations and equipment, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is important is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to break. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more integrated, and more supportive of the government and the state in the wake of this attack."