🔗 Share this article

The movie features a impressive ensemble, depicting the true tale of coach Brendan Ingle, who mentored a brash Sheffield teenager from Yemeni immigrant parents. Dubbed “Prince” Naseem Hamed, the fighter was taught to confront prejudice and molded into a media-friendly world champion in the late 90s. The trainer cultivated his flamboyant arrogance and lethal fists, but after becoming rich, Hamed betrayed his mentor, excluding him and turning him into a blend of John Falstaff and Danny Rose.

Performers and Roles

Pierce Brosnan plays the trainer; Amir El-Masry takes on the part of the prince, and Stephens is the assertive promoter Frank Warren, who recognized the goldmine that the coach had discovered.

Where the Movie Falls Short

However, the movie honestly misses the Prince’s agility: the fight scenes run smoothly, but the crucial story in between is consistently flat and one-note. It lacks subtlety or contrast in the depiction of the protagonist himself, and the actor, an otherwise excellent talent, doesn’t get the opportunity to show any subtlety or much of what might make his role truly engaging – even though he’s obviously been working out and appears convincing in the ring.

Problems with Script and Sound

The story is often lumbered with functional, expositional lines that tell you exactly what is happening and what we are supposed to be thinking (“You started your boxing journey at age seven …”). It is the kind of dialogue that streaming-TV executives call “double-screen”, ensuring you know what’s going on while you’re viewing the movie but also glancing at your device. Additionally, the score is overpowering, at times nearly overwhelming, particularly in the moment where the boxer gets overexcited calling on the promoter in his luxurious residence.

Acting and Pivotal Scenes

While El-Masry and Brosnan do their very best, their relationship never really comes to life, and the big set-piece fight scenes are frequently anticlimactically truncated. A key moment is surely when, provoked past his limit in the training facility one day by Hamed as a misguided “elder”, Ingle in fact offers to get in the ring and box him. Everyone in the room is shocked and uneasy. How exactly is this extremely unwise confrontation going to unfold? How precisely the outcome? Surely the champion is going to defeat him? Alternatively will he emotionally pull his punches? The resolution remains ambiguous.

Bright Spots and Comedy

This isn’t to imply that there aren’t some nice jabs. Brosnan gets laughs when his character tells a reporter what he’s instructing the kids from his neighborhood: to reject bias and when you meet a offender, “Hit them in the bollocks”. It’s funny too when the boxer squirms at the silly antics the coach makes him do in the early days: posing as the “beast from the East”.

Plot and Conclusion

Regarding the falling out, the movie shows this as being worsened by a revealing publication that Ingle is allegedly authored (a story element evidently adapted from another source), and there is an intriguingly conceived last discussion – although the heartfelt homage that the boxer is supposed to have given to Ingle after his passing is merely referenced in the end titles, and not shown on film. Some interesting material in this film, but the blows fail to connect.

The film screened at the festival and is available in UK and Irish cinemas from 9 January.