🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold policy to restrict social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are observing intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of nations are exploring comparable measures.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader arguing that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our youngsters' youth". Legislation may be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban is "an tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to enact a law increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised guardians to block their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a advisory motion supporting a ban for under-16s unless parental consent is granted. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" design of these apps, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A clear age limit is a solid starting point," commented the MEP behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "supported by robust research".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a bill to impose controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the government vowed to further research the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. An organization founded by the relatives of a young person who was lost after encountering harmful platform posts contends that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when users become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to build platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for young users," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Approach

Stateside, regulation is largely occurring at the local level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it faces court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with additional access requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills requiring adult authorization for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from various figures to mimic Australia's example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Apart from these regions, other countries are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, world agencies strike a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could prove counterproductive". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

While this global debate continues, the policies of this nation and several other countries show that policymakers globally are less and less content to wait for platforms to make changes on their own.